Évariste Ngamana maintains that Central African nationality remains strictly singular, prohibiting citizens from holding dual status. He stated, "la loi dit tout simplement que la nationalité centrafricaine est une et exclusive," adding, "C’est-à-dire que tu ne peux pas la détenir concurremment à une autre nationalité." Évariste Ngamana claims that Central African nationality is one and exclusive, prohibiting the concurrent holding of another nationality.
Applying this legal interpretation to Anicet-Georges Dologuélé, Évariste Ngamana asserts that the politician forfeited his Central African nationality upon acquiring French citizenship. Évariste Ngamana asserts that Anicet-Georges Dologuélé lost his Central African nationality upon acquiring French citizenship. Regarding the process for potential restoration, Évariste Ngamana noted, "Pour que M. de Léguélé redevienne centrafricain, la loi dit, il faut que celui qui a perdu […] puisse écrire au Président de la République." He concluded that "Le Président prendra un décret pour sa réintégration" to formalize any such status change. Évariste Ngamana states that to regain Central African nationality, an individual must write to the President of the Republic to initiate a reintegration procedure.
Legal Arguments for Exclusivity
Évariste Ngamana maintains that the process for an individual to regain Central African nationality requires a formal submission. According to his interpretation of the law, the individual must write to the President of the Republic to initiate a reintegration procedure. This request serves as the initial step for the state to evaluate the case and determine if legal standing for restoration exists. The requirement for a formal, written request to the President of the Republic shows the position held by Évariste Ngamana regarding the necessity of state-led intervention in matters of citizenship status.
Anicet-Georges Dologuélé disputes the claim that the acquisition of a foreign nationality results in the automatic loss of Central African citizenship. He argues that such an interpretation lacks a basis in the current legal framework. Anicet-Georges Dologuélé contests the interpretation that the loss of Central African nationality is automatic upon acquiring a foreign nationality. The politician asserts that the loss of nationality cannot occur through an immediate or informal mechanism.
The argument presented by Anicet-Georges Dologuélé emphasizes that any revocation of nationality must follow specific procedures outlined in the Code of Nationality. Anicet-Georges Dologuélé argues that the loss of nationality must follow specific procedures outlined in the Code of Nationality. He contends that the state must adhere to these established steps to ensure that the deprivation of citizenship remains consistent with the law. By focusing on these requirements, he challenges the application of the exclusivity principle to his own status, maintaining that the legal framework does not support the automatic forfeiture of his citizenship. The disagreement centers on whether the Code of Nationality provides a mandate for administrative due process before any change to an individual's nationality status can be legally recognized by the state.