Sana Bangui, Governor of the Bank of Central African States (BEAC), faces accusations of political ambition and institutional misconduct, detailed in a document from BEAC personnel circulating since February 1, 2026. The personnel allege that Mr. Bangui, who is the nephew of the current President of the Central African Republic, is using his influential position to further personal political aims and has violated internal regulations, including a mandatory three-month notice period for employee transfers. These allegations, presented by the BEAC staff, paint a picture of a leader engaged in a "mafia-like arrangement" and operating with "ethical shortcomings." The document, which has been circulating among BEAC personnel, serves as a formal alert, intended, according to its authors, as a "mechanism to restore the rule of law within BEAC and protect the integrity of the common currency" of the Central African Economic and Monetary Community (CEMAC).
The document states that Mr. Bangui "met en avant ses liens familiaux directs avec la Présidence centrafricaine (son oncle en est le Président)" and "affirme également, pour se conférer une stature qu’il n’a pas, être le prochain Président de la République centrafricaine, au cours ou à l’achèvement de son mandat actuel de gouverneur." This behavior, according to the BEAC personnel, creates "une confusion délétère entre l’institution monétaire régionale, censée être neutre et indépendante, et des agendas électoraux nationaux particuliers, des intérêts politiques et des stratégies personnelles d’accession au pouvoir." The personnel also noted specific instances of alleged abuse, noting that two women were transferred on August 30, 2024, for a start date of October 1, 2024, violating the mandatory three-month notice period stipulated by BEAC regulations. This alleged violation shows a pattern of disregarding established institutional procedures, according to the personnel.
Allegations of Political Maneuvering and Institutional Subversion
BEAC staff claim Sana Bangui, the Bank's Governor, openly states he will be the next President of the Central African Republic, either during or at the conclusion of his current term as governor. This assertion, the personnel contend, directly compromises the neutrality expected of a regional monetary institution. Personnel allege that Mr. Bangui claims to have contributed "largely and decisively" to the election of the current Gabonese President, thereby implying a significant political influence beyond his official role. The staff further assert that Mr. Bangui claims his influence on BEAC management surpasses that of the other four CEMAC Heads of State, suggesting an unwarranted and disproportionate personal power within the organization.
Mr. Bangui allegedly claims total independence from the Ministerial Committee, citing a higher legitimacy derived from the Conference of Heads of State. This posture, according to the staff, allows him to operate without due oversight. The staff describe this attitude as "institutionally destructive drift," which they contend forms the foundation of "autocratic governance devoid of any control and accountability." This alleged disregard for established governance structures is a central theme of the personnel's complaint.
The case of Nguelle Obame is cited by the staff as a prime illustration of arbitrary decisions imposed through alleged connections and personal influence, rather than adherence to institutional norms. Additionally, it is alleged that Michel Dzombala acted under the protection and manipulation of Sana Bangui, indicating a pattern of leveraging personal relationships for operational control. Mr. Bangui allegedly claims to act under the cover of privileged relations with the Gabonese Presidency, further entrenching his perceived immunity from standard procedures. It is further alleged that both Mr. Dzombala and Mr. Bangui ignored appeals from high-ranking Gabonese officials and violated mandatory BEAC regulatory texts, demonstrating a consistent pattern of defiance against both internal rules and external influence when it conflicts with their alleged agenda.
The Board of Directors and the Ministerial Committee, which are supposed to provide critical oversight, are allegedly treated with contempt by the Governor. The BEAC staff claim the Audit Committee, a key body for financial integrity and transparency, is treated as a "docile carpet" of the Bank's government, functioning merely as a subordinate bureaucratic instrument and an automatic validation tool rather than an independent watchdog. This alleged subversion of key oversight bodies, the personnel argue, facilitates an environment ripe for misconduct and lack of accountability.
Abuse of Power and Institutional Capture
Minister Ebe Molina Ivan is identified by BEAC personnel as the "unwavering and active support" of Abbas Mahamat Tolli during his time in office. This support, the personnel claim, was instrumental in facilitating the alleged misconduct. Abbas Mahamat Tolli allegedly took decisive actions to ensure Sana Bangui's controversial ascension to the Governor position, suggesting a premeditated effort to install him in power. Personnel further allege a "mafia-like arrangement" involving Abbas Tolli, Ebe Molina, and Sana Bangui, which they claim is dedicated to opacity, fraud, and managerial drift within the institution. This arrangement, they contend, has systematically undermined the integrity and operational effectiveness of the BEAC.
The staff contend that Ebe Molina's mandate was characterized by "ethical shortcomings and a strategy presented as institutional capture for clan and relational interests." This suggests that his actions were not in the best interest of the institution but rather served a narrow, personal agenda. Ebe Molina allegedly prioritized the "preservation of personal material advantages and emoluments, as well as safeguarding his ministerial post," further illustrating a focus on self-interest over institutional duty. The personnel also claim that Ebe Molina adopted a posture of inaction, which they describe as particularly grave given that the victims of alleged abuses were his compatriots. This inaction, they argue, points to a deliberate choice to overlook severe misconduct.
Sana Bangui allegedly attempted to modify the institutional mechanism for the rotation of the Presidency of the Audit Committee. This initiative, according to the personnel, was ultimately rejected, indicating that not all attempts to subvert institutional norms were successful, yet noting the Governor's alleged intent to consolidate control.
Sexual Harassment and Retaliation
Among the most serious allegations are those of sexual harassment and subsequent retaliation. Mademoiselle Ayi Bacale Esperanza Ramona allegedly experienced a "violent sexual conquest attempt, repeated sexual touching, and brutal gestures unequivocally characterizing a rape attempt" by Sana Bangui. This accusation describes a severe and aggressive form of alleged misconduct. In a separate accusation, Mademoiselle Susana Jones Lajay reportedly suffered "insistent, threatening, and aggressive sexual advances and repeated attempts at physical touching" from the Governor. These allegations detail a pattern of unwanted and intimidating behavior.
Following her refusal of the Governor's alleged advances, Mr. Bangui allegedly orchestrated a "punitive forced transfer" of Ms. Ayi Bacale Esperanza Ramona to Ebibeyin. This transfer, according to the personnel, caused a "dramatic deterioration of her health," necessitating an international medical evacuation to South Africa, noting the severe consequences of the alleged retaliation. Ms. Susana Jones Lajay's refusal of the alleged advances similarly led to a punitive transfer to Malabo, reinforcing the pattern of using transfers as a tool for punishment and intimidation. The two women were transferred on August 30, 2024, for a start date of October 1, 2024, a move that personnel allege violated the mandatory three-month notice period for employee transfers, further demonstrating a disregard for internal regulations when implementing these punitive actions.
BEAC staff assert that these actions violate specific articles of the BEAC Code of Ethics, citing Article 28 pertaining to sexual harassment, Article 27 concerning moral harassment, and Article 21 which addresses respect for dignity. These citations show the internal institutional rules that the Governor allegedly disregarded. Personnel further allege complicity from Minister Ebe Molina and Engonga Obiang, stating that both officials were informed of the facts regarding the two Equato-Guinean victims but allegedly failed to intervene. The staff also refer to penal code provisions in Cameroon, Equatorial Guinea, and the Central African Republic, noting offenses such as attempted rape, sexual harassment, and endangering a person's life in connection with the allegations, indicating the potential for criminal prosecution under national laws.
Legal Recourse and Broader Implications
BEAC staff members have presented their alert as a "mechanism intended to restore the rule of law within BEAC and protect the integrity of the common currency." This statement frames their actions not merely as a complaint but as a critical intervention for institutional stability. They plan to seize the Prosecutor of the Republic of Paris for attempted rape, aggravated sexual harassment, and the deliberate endangerment of a person's life, signaling their intent to pursue legal action in an international jurisdiction. The French Defender of Rights and the European Association against Violence against Women at Work will also be mobilized, indicating a multi-pronged approach to seeking justice and raising awareness. The staff assert that diplomatic immunity will not cover these personal crimes, citing international jurisprudence, which suggests they have considered the legal complexities of prosecuting high-ranking officials. They intend to file complaints with French and American jurisdictions, referencing alleged assets and regular travel of the accused in those countries, thereby targeting potential avenues for legal enforcement and asset seizure. These actions highlight the seriousness with which the BEAC personnel are pursuing accountability, extending their efforts beyond the regional context to international legal frameworks.